Express

ETC Wouldn’t Exist If ‘Permissionless Fallacy’ Was True

Claudia Rivera

Summary: Cryptocurrencies is known as a decentralized world, however the community wanting to expand to a global level leads to an argument that centralization will set in, reports ambcrypto. ETC Developer, Donald McIntyre spoke about a permissionless fallacy meaning "anything can be done, even if it undermines permissionless."  To expand, McIntyre explained that free markets, agreements, ...

Cryptocurrencies is known as a decentralized world, however the community wanting to expand to a global level leads to an argument that centralization will set in, reports ambcrypto. ETC Developer, Donald McIntyre spoke about a permissionless fallacy meaning "anything can be done, even if it undermines permissionless." 

To expand, McIntyre explained that free markets, agreements, money, and property need underlying systems "permissionless-ness" and since blockchains are permissionless, anything that undermines "permissionless-ness" must be stopped. McIntyre believes Ethereum 2.0 will be the only permissionless, minimized, and immutable proof of work smart contract to exist.

By Claudia Rivera

Last Update:

Tags: ,
Link: ETC Wouldn’t Exist If ‘Permissionless Fallacy’ Was True   [Copy]
  • The Making of a Political Darling: Is Chainlink’s Government Deal a Victory for Tech or... 4 days ago
  • Google Steps Into Blockchain: A New Front in the “Ledger Wars” 5 days ago
  • Bitcoin Weekly Analysis: Is a Bear Market on the Horizon? 8 days ago
  • AI Fraud Is Breaking the Internet’s Trust Economy. Can Compliance Tech Keep Up? 11 days ago
  • Can a $300M RWA Fund Save Avalanche's TVL? 11 days ago
  • You need to login to comment.