Express

US Federal Appeals Court Rules Blockchain Records Are Not Protected Under The Fourth Amendment

Emily Mason

Summary: A federal appeals court supported a lower court's decision to accept blockchain transaction records as evidence against a defendent accused of using Coinbase-held Bitcoin to pay for child pornography, as reported by Coindesk. The defendant, Richard Gratkowski, had been convicted and sentenced last year. He appealed the decision arguing that his transactions were not admissible under ...

A federal appeals court supported a lower court's decision to accept blockchain transaction records as evidence against a defendent accused of using Coinbase-held Bitcoin to pay for child pornography, as reported by Coindesk.

The defendant, Richard Gratkowski, had been convicted and sentenced last year. He appealed the decision arguing that his transactions were not admissible under the Fourth Amendment's protection against search and seizure without a warrant.

The appeals court answered that the public aspect of Bitcoin's permissionless blockchain exempts users from reasonable expectation of privacy. The court added that the blockchain records were closer to bank records — which are not protected under the Fourth Amendment — than cell phone metadata. 

By Emily Mason

  • Bitcoin Weekly Analysis: Volume-Price Divergence and High-Level Consolidation Anticipat... 1 day ago
  • Will Introduction of the Stablecoin Act Trigger a Financial Tsunami? 2 days ago
  • Trump Just Opened the Floodgates: What Happens When $9 Trillion in Retirement Money Hit... 5 days ago
  • US Crypto Stash Shock: Marshals' Low BTC Count Fuels 'Secret Sale' Debate, Ignites Buyb... 6 days ago
  • Mini Altcoin Season Brewing? Old Guard's Rally Signals Potential Shift 8 days ago
  • You need to login to comment.