Express

US Federal Appeals Court Rules Blockchain Records Are Not Protected Under The Fourth Amendment

Emily Mason

Summary: A federal appeals court supported a lower court's decision to accept blockchain transaction records as evidence against a defendent accused of using Coinbase-held Bitcoin to pay for child pornography, as reported by Coindesk. The defendant, Richard Gratkowski, had been convicted and sentenced last year. He appealed the decision arguing that his transactions were not admissible under ...

A federal appeals court supported a lower court's decision to accept blockchain transaction records as evidence against a defendent accused of using Coinbase-held Bitcoin to pay for child pornography, as reported by Coindesk.

The defendant, Richard Gratkowski, had been convicted and sentenced last year. He appealed the decision arguing that his transactions were not admissible under the Fourth Amendment's protection against search and seizure without a warrant.

The appeals court answered that the public aspect of Bitcoin's permissionless blockchain exempts users from reasonable expectation of privacy. The court added that the blockchain records were closer to bank records — which are not protected under the Fourth Amendment — than cell phone metadata. 

By Emily Mason

  • The Road to 2026: Where Is the Web3 Ecosystem Heading Next? December 7, 2025
  • Vishwa Advances Agentic Infrastructure Research Through Contribution to Emerging Framew... November 22, 2025
  • BitMart US Launches Operations with 49-State Licensing and Zero-Fee Program November 17, 2025
  • Global Financial Giants Enter Stablecoin Arena in Pivotal Shift October 30, 2025
  • CRYPTO'S NEW PLAY: 24/7 STOCK TRADING October 29, 2025
  • You need to login to comment.