Express

US Federal Appeals Court Rules Blockchain Records Are Not Protected Under The Fourth Amendment

Emily Mason

Summary: A federal appeals court supported a lower court's decision to accept blockchain transaction records as evidence against a defendent accused of using Coinbase-held Bitcoin to pay for child pornography, as reported by Coindesk. The defendant, Richard Gratkowski, had been convicted and sentenced last year. He appealed the decision arguing that his transactions were not admissible under ...

A federal appeals court supported a lower court's decision to accept blockchain transaction records as evidence against a defendent accused of using Coinbase-held Bitcoin to pay for child pornography, as reported by Coindesk.

The defendant, Richard Gratkowski, had been convicted and sentenced last year. He appealed the decision arguing that his transactions were not admissible under the Fourth Amendment's protection against search and seizure without a warrant.

The appeals court answered that the public aspect of Bitcoin's permissionless blockchain exempts users from reasonable expectation of privacy. The court added that the blockchain records were closer to bank records — which are not protected under the Fourth Amendment — than cell phone metadata. 

By Emily Mason

  • From Data Rights to Digital Property: Whistleblower Brittany Kaiser on Blockchain, RWA,... 4 days ago
  • The Base Chain's Ascent: How Deep Coinbase Integration and JPMorgan's Pilot Are Reshapi... 10 days ago
  • Tether in Trouble? U.S. Senate Just Passed a Law That Could Dethrone the $155B Stableco... 13 days ago
  • Justin Sun's Nasdaq Gamble: How Six Years Forged Ties with the Trump Family 14 days ago
  • The Crypto IPO Wave: From Fringe to Front Page 17 days ago
  • You need to login to comment.