Express

US Federal Appeals Court Rules Blockchain Records Are Not Protected Under The Fourth Amendment

Emily Mason

Summary: A federal appeals court supported a lower court's decision to accept blockchain transaction records as evidence against a defendent accused of using Coinbase-held Bitcoin to pay for child pornography, as reported by Coindesk. The defendant, Richard Gratkowski, had been convicted and sentenced last year. He appealed the decision arguing that his transactions were not admissible under ...

A federal appeals court supported a lower court's decision to accept blockchain transaction records as evidence against a defendent accused of using Coinbase-held Bitcoin to pay for child pornography, as reported by Coindesk.

The defendant, Richard Gratkowski, had been convicted and sentenced last year. He appealed the decision arguing that his transactions were not admissible under the Fourth Amendment's protection against search and seizure without a warrant.

The appeals court answered that the public aspect of Bitcoin's permissionless blockchain exempts users from reasonable expectation of privacy. The court added that the blockchain records were closer to bank records — which are not protected under the Fourth Amendment — than cell phone metadata. 

By Emily Mason

  • ​The Crypto Treasury Boom Meets Regulatory Chill: Is the DAT Frenzy Fading? 4 days ago
  • Nasdaq Takes Aim at 'Crypto-Flipping' Companies with Stricter Rules 8 days ago
  • BTC Weekly Outlook: The Oversold Bounce—A Bottom or a Shorting Opportunity? 11 days ago
  • The Making of a Political Darling: Is Chainlink’s Government Deal a Victory for Tech or... 15 days ago
  • Google Steps Into Blockchain: A New Front in the “Ledger Wars” 17 days ago
  • You need to login to comment.